
Omaid Weekly - In the Press
[ Home ]
[ English Section ] [ Feedback ]
[
Subscribe ] [ Books
on Sale ] [ Directory ]
[ Latest News ] [ News Archive ] [
Current Issue ] [ Back Issues ]
[ In the Press ]
Ahmadshah Massoud -
Commander of Afghanistan's United Front
Jane's Defence Weekly, Jun
ANTHONY DAVIS
JDW Correspondent Khwaja Bahauddin, Afghanistan
Following a political accord between leaders of Afghanistan's
anti-Taliban United Front (UF), underscored by improved battlefield
co-ordination, opposition commander Ahmadshah Massoud anticipates Taliban
advances in northern Afghanistan can be checked and even rolled back this
summer.
"Last year we were in a particularly bad financial [and economic]
position. We had neither money, nor aircraft and ammunition," says
Massoud, leader of the UF, during an interview at his Khwaja Bahauddin
military headquarters near the Tajikistan border. Failure to support other
fronts across the north resulted in a concentration of Taliban forces in
the northeast and, after 33 days of bitter fighting and heavy casualties,
the fall of Taloqan, his de facto capital, on 6 September last year.
While he was able to prevent the Taliban overrunning Badakhshan
province, the fall of Taloqan marked Massoud's greatest setback since his
loss of Kabul in September 1996. "There were tactical reasons for our
defeat, such as [Taliban] use of armour, but the most important strategic
reason was that I was unable to get the war moving in parts of the country
in the enemy's rear. When Taloqan fell I had only two helicopters left
operating with considerable difficulty between Panjshir and the north. The
Taliban were able to bring forces and munitions from everywhere and
concentrate pressure against one point."
This year, however, a broad political accord among the often fractious
personalities and factions in the anti-Taliban alliance resulted in an
agreement to suspend the activities of contending political parties and
focus on co-ordinated military resistance, says Massoud. As a result, over
the winter and spring there was a significant rise in military activity in
pockets of anti-Taliban resistance across north and central Afghanistan.
Operations in the central region by Shi'a forces during the late winter
derailed a planned Taliban offensive against his own forces north of
Kabul, he adds.
In addition to Massoud's northeastern forces, estimated to number some
12,000, an estimated 10,000 other UF fighters operate in at least six
pockets of territory in the northern, central and western regions of
Afghanistan. Loosely co-ordinated guerrilla units are led by the
ex-communist Uzbek militia boss Abdul Rashid Dostam, who, after talks with
Massoud, returned to northern Afghanistan in April; Shi'a chiefs Karim
Khalili and Mohaqeq, whose mainly ethnic Hazara forces have been
repeatedly active in recent months around central Bamian and Yakaolang;
and Haji Abdul Qadir who commands Pushtun groups in eastern Kunar and
Nangrahar provinces. In the west, Massoud ally Ismael Khan recently
returned to boost guerrilla operations in Ghor and Herat provinces, while
Massoud loyalist Atta Mohammad heads forces in the Darrah-e-Suf valley in
north-central Afghanistan.
Massoud's purchase this winter of five used Mi-17 (NATO reporting name
'Hip') medium-lift transport helicopters has increased his airlift
capability to six or seven such aircraft and this, he says, has proved
crucial in opening new logistics links with allied fronts. Despite the
improvement, however, the longer-term offensive capabilities of UF pockets
beyond the northeast will likely be constrained by logistics shortages and
limited mobility, say analysts.
Massoud notes that his improved financial position was the result of
greater control over the mining and marketing of gems. Taxation from the
mining of emeralds in the Panjshir Valley and lapis lazuli from southern
Badakhshan province has been a source of revenue for Massoud since the
Soviet occupation. However, the UF commander confirms that over the past
year he has taken over the lion's share of the gems trade directly, and is
marketing both emeralds and lapis internationally.
Massoud is known to buy munitions at favourable rates from Russia and
Iran, and in late October last year he met Igor Sergeyev, the then Russian
defence minister, in Dushanbe. Early this year he visited Moscow for
further talks. In recent weeks his forces have acquired new Soviet-era
tanks and armoured fighting vehicles. While Massoud denies reports of
financial and other assistance from India, an Indian-manned military field
hospital is operating at Parkhar, an Afghan UF base in Tajikistan. In
April he visited France and Belgium in a highly publicised first trip to
Europe.
Massoud notes that despite mounting international pressure on Pakistan
over its support for the Taliban, Islamabad's ruling military regime is
anxious to see decisive Taliban gains this year. "Some 10 days after
my return from Europe [in late April] Pakistani military chiefs held a
meeting in which it was decided to press ahead with the war." As a
result, Islamabad is increasing its commitment of what Massoud claims are
regular Pakistan Army units to Afghanistan.
Massoud alleges that elements of three Pakistani commando regiments are
currently operating in support of Taliban forces and these will soon be
reinforced by additional troops from two Frontier Corps regiments. Western
military analysts, however, remain sceptical of such claims, pointing out
the UF chief has been conspicuously unable to produce convincing evidence
of the deployment of regular Pakistani combat units - as distinct from
religious volunteers and military advisers attached to Islamabad's
Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate.
Massoud argues that continued military resistance to the Taliban
remains essential if the Kabul regime is to be brought to the negotiating
table and the way opened for a political settlement. Such a settlement, he
says, should instal an interim government - possibly including ex-king
Zahir Shah and other neutral Afghans - which should work to collect
weaponry, re-establish security and prepare for general elections after
one or two years. The suggestion that elections would be difficult to hold
in a country as socially and physically devastated as Afghanistan after
such a relatively short interval, he clearly rejects.
Top
[ Latest News ] [ News Archive ] [
Current Issue ] [ Back Issues ]
[ In the Press ]
[
Subscribe ] [ Books
on Sale ] [ Directory ]
[ Home ] [ English
Section ] [ Feedback ]
|