[ Home ] [ English Section ] [ Feedback ]
[ Subscribe ] [ Books on Sale ] [ Directory ]
[ Latest News ] [ News Archive ] [ Current Issue ] [ Back Issues ] [ In the Press ]

Published in issue #438 on 11 September 2000*

The UN Security Council & Afg's continuing miseries (editorial)
Further UN sanctions will only hurt the innocent (opinion)
New "Afghan" movement faces damaging allegations (news)

 

The UN Security Council & Afghanistan's continuing miseries

Editorial

Summarized translation of last issue's Dari-Persian editorial column.

The United Nations Security Council is undoubtedly the most well-known international political organ to claim world peace as its highest objective.

The UNSC has played a key role in helping to solve conflicts throughout the world. Among these accomplishments we can count the settlement of conflicts in Mozambique and parts of the Middle East. Additionally, the Council has or continues to make critical decisions and take pivotal steps in the cases of Iraq, Indonesia's East Timor province, the Caucuses, the Balkans and other so-called hotspots

Some major UNSC actions have included the deployment of peace keeping forces. And every now and then, the Council has taken part in organizing international coalitions in pursuit of its demands for the withdrawal of foreign invaders and belligerents. In those cases, the Council did not shilly-shally or veil itself from responsibility. Instead, swift UNSC action resulted in the quick defeat of tyrants and salvation of innocent victims.

But (with a capital "B"), these humanitarian and benevolent deeds were directed at regions handpicked by certain overlords -- or just overlord (?) -- and determined by them to require success at all costs. More specifically, such resolute actions have come to full fruition, beyond the usual perfunctory measures, in areas where these overlords have either military or economic interests, or both.

The position of the bruised and bloodied nation of Afghanistan, however, has waxed and waned in this unforgiving game. During the past two decades, our nation has at times found itself within the sphere of interest of the overlords. And even then, Afghanistan was the recipient of superficial and useless measures of various degrees, the levels of which were predetermined by the overlords.

When the Soviet Union facilitated the communist takeover of Kabul, Afghanistan became the subject of a handful of paper tiger resolutions condemning the coup d'etat. But when the Red Army invaded the country, thus endangering the interests -- petroleum lifelines, for one -- of some of the overlords, there was a sudden and dramatic increase in the Council's level of attention to Afghanistan.

To date, we have witnessed five years of direct military intervention by Islamabad in our destitute nation. And thus far, at least two UN special envoys have explicitly attested to the presence of Pakistani armed forces and foreign trained mercenaries fighting alongside the Taliban militia against the nation's resistance force.

Moreover, countless independent sources, journalists, eye-witnesses and international agencies -- such as human rights organizations and aid groups -- have time and again, in an array of languages and mediums, testified to Pakistan's blatant invasion and barbaric crimes against the people of Afghanistan. As to why the overlords have chosen to ignore these facts is left for the reader to decide.

Leaving aside the well-documented brutalities and savagery of the Pakistani Army, Osama bin Laden's brigade and Islamabad's Taliban puppets against our people, there is still more than enough cause for effective and beneficial UN action.

Certainly the UNSC and Kofi Annan are literate. They have, undeniably, read Pervez Musharraf's clear-cut statements regarding Islamabad's intent to do with Afghanistan as it wishes. Musharraf's pronouncements have laid to rest any doubt of Pakistan's direct interference in Afghanistan, most visibly through the ISI's creation, support and sustenance of its Taliban deputies. And Pakistan's month-long campaign in the provinces of Takhar, Baghlan, Kunar, Ningarhar and the Shamali have soaked Afghanistan's plains and mountains with blood of the nation's innocent civilians and patriot warriors.

And what was the Security Council's response to this carnage? Nothing, except a meaningless resolution that, in effect, gave the green light to Islamabad to continue its murderous rampage in hot pursuit of Pakistan's goal of the eventual take-over of Afghanistan.

The overlords have spoken, and as expected, nary a word of their damnable rhetoric is of use to the plight of the Afghan people or the cause of a free and sovereign Afghanistan.

Top


 

Further UN sanctions will only hurt the innocent

According to a study published by the United Nations recently, the people of Afghanistan are highly vulnerable and have little capacity to sustain the burden of more economic shocks. 

The population struggles to survive existing sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council that have had a tangible negative effect on the country's economy and on the ability of humanitarian agencies to assist its people.

Almost all Afghan households without an able-bodied male are surviving only on humanitarian aid, children's work and panhandling. In addition, the coping capacity of the civilian population has been severely weakened as a result of the war and the erosion of many traditional support mechanisms.

On the other hand, Afghanistan is currently in the grip of the worst drought since 1971. With both rain and snowfall down, which adversely affects agriculture and livestock, the population has no prospect of a successful crop for the next twelve months.

The economic sanctions have magnified feelings of isolation and victimization among the population. There is a strong sense of bitterness toward the UN, and any new Security Council economic sanction will be perceived as targeting the innocent population.

I am not sure what will be accomplished by imposing further economic sanctions on Afghanistan. If the international community thinks that putting pressure on the authorities to comply with their demands is working, they are mistaken. The authorities have power, money and wide-open borders that they can cross any time and get anything they need.

I just came back from Afghanistan. It is business as usual. There are no shortages of weapons and landmines. But, wheat, milk, and medicine for the poor are scarce commodities. Humanitarian goods are technically exempt in economic sanctions, nevertheless few countries send aid when sanctions are imposed, even if only to help the children.

While we are concerned about finding a political solution for Afghanistan, it makes sense to be also concerned about its human needs, i.e. food and medicine, which must take precedence. Economic sanctions on a nation that is trapped in perpetual political conflict, has no viable economic system, and survives mostly on foreign aid, will hurt only the poor and the vulnerable.

Suraya Sadeed
Executive Director
Help the Afghan Children, Inc.
8133 Leesburg Pike, Suite 310
Vienna, VA 22182, USA
E-mail: htaci@msn.com
Web site: www.htaci.com
Phone: 703-848-0407

Top


New "Afghan" movement faces damaging allegations

Washington, Sep 8 - An Afghan-run television program in the greater Washington DC metropolitan area reports that the Islamic Republic of Iran has funded the launch of a new supposedly Afghan movement in the Virginia suburbs of the United States' capital.

Citing a similar dispatch aired last week on a local Afghan radio program, this report alleged that the new movement was formed on the heels of a new policy launch by Tehran.

Members of this movement, the report adds, are made up of several factions. Two of these factions named by the television report include a small splinter group, formerly members of the Association for Peace and Democracy for Afghanistan (APDA). The second faction is composed of a number of participants in the now discredited Cyprus-Tehran process.

The Cyprus-Tehran process, covertly chaired by Taliban predecessor Gulbudin Hekmatyar, was a project of the Islamic Republic's radical clerics.

Some analysts believe that a fundamental APDA tenet, which prohibits the organization and active members of receiving funds from special interest groups, was one of the main reasons for the breakaway faction's schism with the Association.

It is also rumored in the local Washington community that at least two members of the new movement, unnamed by the television report, were once members of Afghanistan's communist parties. One of these two has been accused by a number of Afghans of being a member of KhAD, or the KGB-trained Afghan communist secret police. No details are yet available.

In perhaps a related story, Pakistan-based News Network International reported on the formation of a "new US-based Afghan group." NNI, which has long served as a propaganda arm of Pakistan's military intelligence operation, or the InterServices Intelligence agency, gave no concrete specifics about the new group's objectives.

Some Afghan observers have said that because the first major public introduction of this new group was broadcast by NNI, it will be cause for even greater concern by both local and other Afghan communities.

The television report concluded with a criticism from Afghan circles who say that Afghanistan's tragic and worsening situation does not merit the formation of new groups or movements created for the explicit purpose of either political or financial gain.

These reports, however, have not yet been verified.

Top


*From this week's English-language page of the hard-copy edition of Omaid Weekly. Visit the Subscription page for details on how to subscribe to the hard-copy edition Omaid Weekly.

Please contact us at copyright@omaid.com if you wish to reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, publish or broadcast any portion of the copyright protected materials in this page. Barring unforeseen circumstances, you will receive a prompt and favorable response.

[ Latest News ] [ News Archive ] [ Current Issue ] [ Back Issues ]
[ Subscribe ] [ Books on Sale ] [ Directory ]
[ Home ] [ English Section ] [ Feedback ]